facebook
twitter
ISSN: 1734-4948
Advances in Rehabilitation
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
1/2019
vol. 33
 
Share:
Share:
abstract:
Original paper

Test–retest reliability of the newly developed field-based tests focuses on short time efforts with maximal intensity for wheelchair basketball players

Jolanta Marszałek
1
,
Andrzej Kosmol
1
,
Natalia Morgulec-Adamowicz
1
,
Anna Mróz
2
,
Karol Gryko
2
,
Bartosz Molik
1

1.
Józef Piłsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw, Faculty of Rehabilitation
2.
Józef Piłsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw, Faculty of Physical Education
Advances in Rehabilitation/Postępy Rehabilitacji (1), 23–27, 2019
Online publish date: 2019/04/11
View full text Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
Introduction
There are some studies concern special field-based tests for wheelchair basketball players however, there were not a lot of studies confirmed reliability and/or validity of wheelchair basketball field-based tests. The aim of the present study was to assess test-retest reliability of the newly developed field-based tests focused on short time efforts with maximal intensity for wheelchair basketball players.

Material and methods
Nine elite male wheelchair basketball players (mean age 29.7 ± 5.9 years) performed two times 11 field-based tests focused on short time efforts with the maximal intensity: 3 m sprint, 5 m sprint, 10 m sprint, 20 m sprint, pass basketball ball by both hands from the chest, pass medicine ball (3 kg) by both hands from the chest, bilateral handgrip, 3-6-9 m drill test, 30-seconds sprint test, agility drill test, and 10x5 m sprint test. All sprint tests’ time were measured by Microgate® photocells (Bolzano, Italy). Differences between field-based tests repetitions were compared by the t-test for dependent samples, relationship between repetitions was calculated by the Pearson correlation coefficient, and the ICCs were calculated (test-retest reliability).

Results
The ICCs were ‘very good’, correlations were strong for each field-based test (r > 0.7). Only for the agility drill test the first repetition is statistically different compare to the second repetition (p = .015).

Conclusions
The main application of our research is a confirmation of reliability of 10 field-based tests related to short time efforts with maximum intensity: 3 m sprint, 5 m sprint, 10 m sprint, 20 m sprint, pass basketball ball by both hands from the chest, pass medicine ball (3 kg) by both hands from the chest, bilateral handgrip, 3-6-9 m drill test, 30-seconds sprint test, and 10x5 m sprint test.

keywords:

anaerobic performance, athlete, assessment, evaluation











Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.